Most coaches agree that if you can create more 5-on-4 situations than your opponent, then you stand a better chance of winning.
At the same time, wouldnโt it be nice to simplify your offensive goal for your team? Have you ever had players ask you, โCoach, why are we Passing, Cutting, Dribbling-A,t and Feeding the Post and Cutting?โ (Layers 1-3)
Hereโs your answer: โWe are trying to create 5-on-4 situations.โ
Isnโt that the essence of 1-on-1? If I can get around my defender, then Iโve created a 5-on-4 situation. The Read & React Offense is designed to get the maximum out ofย a 5-on-4 situation. For those who know what Iโm talking about, consider Layers 4 and 5: Circle Movement and Basic Post Slides. But I donโt want to talk about what to do when the 5-on-4 is created, I want to look at creatingย the 5-on-4.
Layers 1-3 create a lot of Player Movement and Ball Movement with the majority of attention on spacing. One of the purposes of Layers 1-3 is to shake the defense out of their โhelpingโ defensive positions in order to create trueย 1-on-1 situations like our Draft Drives. (Not 1-on-2 or 1-on-3. I donโt consider these to be trueย 1-on-1 cases).
Now, during this action thatโs meant to set up a 1-on-1ย (5-on-4), a few possibilities may open up:
- One of the defenders stepsย over the Read Line for a backdoor
- Catch a defender on a Give-and-Go, Front or Rear Cut
- Create a back-door basket cut with a Dribble-At.
When the offensive player gets the ball on one of these basket cuts, it becomes a 5-on-4 situation!
You have the same offensive situation that you were trying to create with a standard 1-on-1 move. But most players donโt look at receiving the ball on a basket cut the way they view getting around their defender with a 1-on-1 move. They donโt view it as a 5-on-4 situation; however, itโs probably a cleaner 5-on-4 situation than the traditional 1-on-1-with-the-ball move.
Perhaps if you explain 5-on-4 situations to your players, and the two basic ways to create them (Driving 1-on-1 and Basket Cutting) theyโll know what theyโre hunting for and they wonโt view one of them as more desirable than the other.
Donโt hunt onlyย for intelligent drives and donโt hunt onlyย for cuttingย situations; look for both of them at the same time. They both create 5-on-4 situations.
